From pryce at ucla.edu  Wed Sep  9 04:51:14 2009
From: pryce at ucla.edu (Paul Rigor (ucla))
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 21:51:14 -0700
Subject: [Turbolucene] python 2.6 compatibility
Message-ID: <78771fdc0909082151n7cc25594x7a79d3f58c4c5cf3@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,
Are there any issues with python 2.6?

Thanks,
Paul

-- 
Paul Rigor
Graduate Student
Institute for Genomics and Bioinformatics
Donald Bren School of Information and Computer Sciences
University of California, Irvine
http://www.paulrigor.net/
http://www.ics.uci.edu/~prigor
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.krys.ca/pipermail/turbolucene/attachments/20090909/ff6bb644/attachment.htm

From krys at krys.ca  Wed Sep  9 22:06:33 2009
From: krys at krys.ca (Krys Lawrence)
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 18:06:33 -0400
Subject: [Turbolucene] python 2.6 compatibility
In-Reply-To: <78771fdc0909082151n7cc25594x7a79d3f58c4c5cf3@mail.gmail.com>
References: <78771fdc0909082151n7cc25594x7a79d3f58c4c5cf3@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <200909091806.33800.krys@krys.ca>

Hi Paul,

Thanks for your interest in TurboLucene! :)

Unfortunately, I have not maintained TurboLucene for a long time.  I do not 
use it personally anymore and have lost the motivation to do anything with it.

That said, I believe that PyLucene works differently now and no longer has the 
issue (thread conflicts with CherryPy) that TurboLucene was initially created 
to solve.  Also TurboGears 2.0 no longer even uses CherryPy, making it further 
a moot point.

My recommendation to you would be to just try using PyLucene directly.  It's a 
pretty awesome project and reasonably easy to get started with.  More to the 
point, it is supported and not abandoned! :)

Alternatively, depending on your needs, you might want to check out Woosh.  
It's a pure-Python search library that looks interesting.

Anyway, I hope this helps.

Good luck to you!
Krys

On Wednesday, September 9, 2009 12:51:14 am Paul Rigor (ucla) wrote:
> Hi,
> Are there any issues with python 2.6?
>
> Thanks,
> Paul


From pryce at ucla.edu  Wed Sep  9 23:14:29 2009
From: pryce at ucla.edu (Paul Rigor (ucla))
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 16:14:29 -0700
Subject: [Turbolucene] python 2.6 compatibility
In-Reply-To: <200909091806.33800.krys@krys.ca>
References: <78771fdc0909082151n7cc25594x7a79d3f58c4c5cf3@mail.gmail.com> 
	<200909091806.33800.krys@krys.ca>
Message-ID: <78771fdc0909091614v3bc8fc48h34443a1067ed97d4@mail.gmail.com>

Thanks Krys!Paul

On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Krys Lawrence <krys at krys.ca> wrote:

> Hi Paul,
>
> Thanks for your interest in TurboLucene! :)
>
> Unfortunately, I have not maintained TurboLucene for a long time.  I do not
> use it personally anymore and have lost the motivation to do anything with
> it.
>
> That said, I believe that PyLucene works differently now and no longer has
> the
> issue (thread conflicts with CherryPy) that TurboLucene was initially
> created
> to solve.  Also TurboGears 2.0 no longer even uses CherryPy, making it
> further
> a moot point.
>
> My recommendation to you would be to just try using PyLucene directly.
>  It's a
> pretty awesome project and reasonably easy to get started with.  More to
> the
> point, it is supported and not abandoned! :)
>
> Alternatively, depending on your needs, you might want to check out Woosh.
> It's a pure-Python search library that looks interesting.
>
> Anyway, I hope this helps.
>
> Good luck to you!
> Krys
>
> On Wednesday, September 9, 2009 12:51:14 am Paul Rigor (ucla) wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Are there any issues with python 2.6?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Paul
>
>


-- 
Paul Rigor
Graduate Student
Institute for Genomics and Bioinformatics
Donald Bren School of Information and Computer Sciences
University of California, Irvine
http://www.paulrigor.net/
http://www.ics.uci.edu/~prigor
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.krys.ca/pipermail/turbolucene/attachments/20090909/d20d54e1/attachment.htm